| |
Dr. Lillian Cassel and Dr. Paula Matuszek Office: (Cassel) 161 Mendel Phone (Cassel) 610 519 7341 |
Office hours: Most days 10
am to 6 pm. Call if you want to be sure I am there and free. Snow closing number on KYW Radio is 524
|
|
| Villanova University Academic Integrity Policy and Procedures | |||
| Schedule | Texts | Web pages created by class members | Grading |
This schedule is incomplete at the beginning of the course and will
be filled in as we determine topics of interest to class members.
| Week | Date | Topic | Reading/Slides | Assignment |
| 1 | 1/23 |
Introduction - Course Structure Expectations, Topics, An example application |
Reading assignments are shown on the week when they are due. All must be read before class begins. |
For Class 2, bring a brief description of at least two topics of interest. These will be candidates for investigation during this course. |
| 2 | 1/30 |
Chapters 2 and 3 If you know XML and/or RDF, you can skim these chapters. If you are not familiar with these, you need to read these chapters carefully |
Do exercises 2.1, 2.2, 2.5, 3.3, 3.5, 3.19, 3.21 |
|
| 3 | 2/6 |
Proposed
topics for presentations |
Chapter 4 |
4.3, 4.4, 4.7, 4.14 (applied to domain from 3.21 perhaps), 4.17, 4.18 |
| 4 | 2/13 |
Inferences and Rules Team formation; Ongoing projects to select or to use as examples in forming a project The Computing Ontology Project |
Chapter 5 |
|
| 5 | 2/20 |
Chapters 6 and 7 |
||
| 6 | 2/27 |
Design Reviews. All teams will present formal designs for their projects. The class will review these together, offering suggestions and warning of perceived problems |
||
| Break | 3/6 |
|
||
| 7 | 3/13 |
Discussion of 3
papers previously selected and read. Each paper will be
introduced by one member of the class who is also responsible for
keeping the discussion going until the topic is thoroughly explored. |
What will the semantic web look
like: Readings 1,
2,
3
|
|
| 3/20 |
Cyc -- Guest speaker, Cynthia Matuszek. Long term experience with a real ontology project. . |
|
||
| 3/27 |
Discussion of 2
papers.
Interim report of
project status by 2 teams. Formal presentation by the team of the
current status and plans for the project. Prototype
demonstrations as appropriate.
(Teams that do not include on of the discussion leaders.) |
Semantic Agents Reading - Concept Map |
||
| 4/3 |
Discussion of 2
papers. Eric
Clark: Web of trust project. Permissions, security,
encryption Remaining interim
reports. |
|||
| 4/10 |
Discussion of 3
papers. Paula
Matuszek: TBA |
|||
| Easter | 4/17 |
Easter Break, no class. Time to work on projects |
|
|
| 4/24 |
Discussion of 3 papers William King: Alternatives to the W3C model What are the alternatives to having "special tags"? Just make search more intelligent? Jaideep Raheja: Data management. What steps, algorithms exist for retrieving, deleting, updating tags. Boots
Cassel: TBA |
|||
| 5/1 |
Conference
style presentation of projects |
|||
| 5/8 |
Conference style presentation of
projects continues |
|||
The MIT Press. 2004. ISBN 0-262-01210-3
Grading
Your performance will be assessed based on regular, active
participation in and contribution to the class discussions; some
homework assignments , a team project that you will design and
implement; several class presentations of varying length. I prefer not
to have examinations unless it seems necessary for the integrity of the
course.
Here is a starting point for a grading plan:
Grades available are A, B, C and F, with + / - options on the A, B, C
grades.
1. Do everything that is required for the course (submit every
assignment on time, complete and correct), attend every class and
participate actively. ===> B
2. Do less than what is required, grade goes down. The
amount depends on how much is neglected.
3. Do more than what is required, the grade goes up. Again,
the amount of increase depends on the degree of excellence of the work.